Archive for category The Torah
Previously, in Part 1 of our two-part series,
we provided the groundwork for our present examination of the facts regarding whether or
not water baptism is a prerequisite for the
partaking of the Passover meal.
Replaced by Water Baptism?
It is then claimed that after Yahushua’s death and resurrection the requirement of fleshy circumcision especially for the Passover was “replaced” by water baptism. To make this point, the following quote by Saul (Paul) is given:
The reason being that the majority of Sacred Name groups of today assert that in order for a person to partake of the Passover meal they must have undergone a mandatory water baptism in the proper name of the messiah.
It is also maintained by these groups that before the death of Yahushua the messiah, in order to partake of the Passover meal, all men had to be fleshly circumcised.
Different Passover Systems
We must first admit to a basic difference in the opinion about Passover. To begin with, many Christians are often unaware that there were several different Passover systems practiced by the ancient Jews.
In Circumcision & Passover – Pt 2 our discussion left off with the evidence provided from Scriptures to prove that the Israelites kept the Passover in the wilderness including all uncircumcised males.
We now need to go back and take another look at Exod. 12:48 in context where the command is given for all males to be circumcised in order to partake of the Passover.
And when a stranger shall sojourn with you, and will keep the passover to Yahweh, LET ALL HIS MALES BE CIRCUMCISED, and then let him come near and keep it; AND HE SHALL BE AS ONE THAT IS BORN IN THE LAND: FOR NO UNCIRCUMCISED PERSON SHALL EAT OF IT. (Exod. 12:48)
The reader then has to proceed on to Exod. 13:5 where it states:
And WHEN YAHWEH BRINGS YOU INTO THE LAND of the Canaanites, the Hittites, the Amorites, the Hivites, and the Jeb’usites, which he swore to your fathers to give you, a land flowing with milk and honey, YOU SHALL KEEP THIS SERVICE (the Passover) in this month. (Exod. 13:5)
It is important to now notice what happens as soon as the Israelites do cross over to the west side of the Jordan and enter the land after 40 years in the wilderness:
In Circumcision & Passover – Pt 1 we covered the testimony regarding fleshy circumcision as found in the New Testament. We will now continue on the Trail of Truth to reveal the confirmation of that testimony primarily from the Old Testament.
A close examination of the book of Genesis, for example, reveals that fleshly circumcision was not a legal requirement of the original contract made with Abram (Abraham) in the Abrahamic Covenants of Promise.
Abraham Blessed Before Fleshly Circumcision
Before the token of fleshly circumcision was used by Abraham and his household (which did not come into effect until Genesis 17), we read in Genesis 12:
Fleshy circumcision is also held by some as a proof that Passover is not an actual Festival or Feast Day for the reason that the lack of circumcision would prevent individuals from participating in a required sacred day of Yahweh.
What do Scriptures actually say concerning this issue?
If you are interested in finding out the truth of the matter then it would be advantageous for you to hop on the Trail of Truth to investigate.
Before we can directly address the issue of circumcision as it relates to Passover we must first determine if Scriptures demand fleshy circumcision in order for men to be saved.
Usually two reasons are given by the advocates of circumcision:
• Abraham was circumcised and he was commanded to circumcise all the males of his household.
• Fleshly circumcision is required in the written Torah of Moses.
What has been noticed is that most of these followers have failed to recognize that they have chosen the wrong Torah! The fact of the matter is that Scriptures point out that there is more than one Torah for you to choose from.
It is important to recognize that keeping the right Torah leads to eternal life and attempting to keep the wrong one is only going to reward a person with eternal death come Judgment Day.
If you were not aware of such a notion then it is highly suggested that you keep reading to discover the facts of the matter.
Now that you’ve got Part 1 finished, you might still be wondering if that “free ticket” to salvation is as good as you thought it was. If any doubts linger, it is highly suggested that you proceed onward with Part 2 of our investigation.
Scriptures indicate that our inheritance cannot be obtained without a sinless sacrifice. The process required that father Yahweh give Yahu Yahweh all things, even his sacred name, and then Yahu, in turn, would pass on these things as an inheritance in a conditional will.
Genesis 26:1-5, confirms that the covenant with Abraham was conditional when it reports that Yahweh told Isaak that he would fulfill the promises, “BECAUSE Abraham listened to my voice and obeyed my charge, my commandments, my statutes, and my laws.”
Yet, even Abraham was a sinner, for all have sinned. He, like the rest of us, must come into the eternal inheritance by grace and by means of the messiah.
Torah of Moses Brings Curse
Further requirements were attached to the promises given to Abraham because of transgression (Gal. 3:18-19). These conditions were given in the form of the Torah of Moses or Old Covenant made at Mount Sinai and the “works of the Law (Torah)” which were added thereto (Rom. 9:32; Gal. 2:16, 3:2, 5, 10), i.e., as found in the books of the Torah. The covenant at Mount Sinai and works of the Torah did two things:
In our two previous posts, The Law and Problematic Paul, Part 1 and Part 2, the details were laid out regarding the the Torah of Moses (the Law, Old Covenant) and its relationship to the Abrahamic Covenants of Promise.
Additionally, Paul in the New Testament seems to stress the concept of grace and that we are no longer under “the Law.”
For sin shall not have dominion over you: for ye are not under the law (Torah of Moses), but under grace. What then? shall we sin, because we are not under the law, but under grace? The deity forbid. (Romans 6:14-15)
Does grace provide a free ticket to salvation?
If you’re not sure about the answer, how about we proceed to investigate the truth of the matter.
After perusing Part 1, one might be thinking, “Paul’s writings are just a bit confusing. Why don’t we just play it safe and attempt to keep ‘The Law’ (Torah of Moses) as best as we can along with all of its works. Yahweh knows what is in our hearts and he will surely forgive any ignorance or failings on our part. When the time is right, Yahweh will reveal his truth to us and we will adjust our actions accordingly.”
Even if one were to have this attitude it would be wise to note:
For whoever keeps the whole law but fails in one point has become guilty of all of it. (James 2:10)
Currently, there seems to exist a serious lack of understanding regarding the concept of the Torah of Moses (the Law, Old Covenant) and its relationship to the Abrahamic Covenants of Promise (Torah of Trust).
Without this understanding it is virtually impossible for one to properly discuss the terms “Abrahamic Covenants of Promise,” “The Law,” “Works of the Law,” “Torah of Moses,” “Old Covenant,” and “New Covenant.”
If one is interested in delving deeper into this subject then it is highly suggested you join our investigation as we uncover the facts concerning “The Law.”
The Prevailing Viewpoints
Let’s first take a look at some of the prevailing viewpoints floating around out there.
• Some believe that the Law (Torah of Moses, Old Covenant) has been completely done away with, including the Ten Commandments, and that we are now under grace.
• Others maintain that the Law (Torah of Moses, Old Covenant) is still in force and must be adhered to including all of the works that are contained within it.
• There are also those who not only maintain that the Law (Torah of Moses, Old Covenant) is still in force but if the physical Temple was in existence we would be under the legal requirement of all the Temple rituals including animal sacrifices.
• There is another viewpoint that the Torah of Moses is only for the Jews and that non-Jews need not “labor under the Law (Torah of Moses).”
What we will do next is endeavor to arrive at a proper understanding of what constitutes the Torah of Moses. We will then determine if in fact the Torah has been completely done away with or if all or any part of it is still applicable.
Torah of Moses a Marriage Covenant
It shall also be demonstrated, among other things, that the Torah given at Mount Sinai was a marriage covenant between Yahweh and the nation of Israel. It must be noted that this particular Torah, referred to as the “Torah of Moses,” “The Law,” and “Old Covenant,” was brought about due to Israelite transgressions against the Abrahamic Covenants of Promise.
The Torah of Moses was used to teach the Israelites what sin (transgression) was, thereby revealing in written form the conditions of the earlier verbal Abrahamic Covenants of Promise (Torah of Trust). It basically put into writing those original conditions and augmented them with judgments.
Works of the Law
Nevertheless, the Israelites continued to break their marriage vows. As a result, under the condition to obey Yahweh’s voice (Gen. 26:5), the Old Covenant was further augmented with what became known as the “works of the Law.”
To proceed with our discussion, we will need to address the concept of an “augmentation.”
The Torah (Law; Gal. 3:15-20), or Old Covenant (Heb. 8:8-13), came into existence several centuries after the Covenants of Promise were given to Abraham. The Torah (Old Covenant) was in fact an augmentation of these Covenants of Promise. William Smith (Smith Bible Dictionary) reminds us that it is “all-important, for the proper understanding of the law, to remember its entire dependence on the Abrahamic covenant.”
In form, the Old Covenant was a marriage covenant between Yahweh and the nation of Israel (Jer. 31:31-32; Isa. 54:5). It was intended to bind the Israelites to the conditions of the Abrahamic Covenants (Torah of Trust) by a written contract that in essence stated: If you do this, then I will do this.
The Torah is called the “Old Covenant” to distinguish it from the “New Covenant” of marriage that Yahweh is yet to make with the elect of Israel.
In speaking of a new covenant he treats the first as obsolete. And what is becoming obsolete and growing old is ready to vanish away. (Hebrews 8:13)
Behold, the days come, says Yahweh, that I will make a new covenant with the house of Israel, and with the house of Judah: Not according to the covenant that I made with their fathers in the day that I took them by the hand to bring them out of the land of Egypt; which my covenant they broke, although I was an husband unto them, says Yahweh: But this shall be the covenant that I will make with the house of Israel; After those days, says Yahweh, I will put my law in their inward parts, and write it in their hearts; and will be their eloahim, and they shall be my people. (Jeremiah 31:31-33)
Why then the law (Torah of Moses; Old Covenant)? It was an augmentation because of transgressions, until the σπέρμα (sperma; group of seed, the elect) should come to whom the promise had been made. (Galatians 3:19)
Accordingly, the expression “Old Covenant” must not be confused with earlier covenants, such as the “Covenants of Promise” made with Abraham.
The Torah (Old Covenant) was established at Mount Sinai, only a few weeks after the Exodus when Israel came out of Egypt, in the third month of that year (Exod. 19:1-2). The precepts of this marriage agreement declared in writing that if the Israelites obeyed Yahweh’s voice and kept his commandments, statutes, and judgments Yahweh would give them the land—from the Suph Sea (Gulf of Aqaba) unto the Palestim Sea (Mediterranean), and from the wilderness (of Sinai) unto the River (Euphrates), i.e., the Promised Land (Exod. 23:20-23).
All the people of Israel agreed, and the marriage covenant was ratified (Exod. 24:1-8).
Old Covenant Does Not Annul Abrahamic Promises
According to Scriptures, although the Torah (Old Covenant) gives the inheritance as a reward for keeping the marriage covenant, it does not annul the promises of inheritance given to Abraham in the “Covenants of Promise.” Saul reports:
For if those of the Torah (of Moses) are the heirs, trust has been made empty, and the promise is of no effect. (Rom. 4:14)
Put another way, if the inheritance only went to those who came under the Torah (Old Covenant) and its works, then what worth are the Covenants of Promise given much earlier to Abraham and his seed (the messiah)?
Was not the inheritance of this will guaranteed to Abraham because he trusted Yahweh, obeyed Yahweh’s voice, and kept Yahweh’s charge, commandments, statutes, and laws? Did not Yahweh give an oath to fulfill his covenant with Abraham swearing to do so by his sacred name?
In his epistle to the Galatians, Saul begins to clarify this issue when he writes:
This now I say, a covenant confirmed beforehand by the deity unto the messiah, the Torah (of Moses) having taken place 430 years after, does not annul so as to make of no effect the promise; because if the inheritance is out of the Torah (of Moses), it is no longer out of promise. But to Abraham, through promise, the deity granted it. (Gal. 3:17-18)
This statement confirms that the inheritance is not accomplished solely from the Torah given at Mount Sinai, even though the Torah of Moses allows for the inheritance if all of its precepts are kept.
Rather, the Covenants of Promise were granted to Abraham and, as with any covenant agreement made by men, it cannot be changed (Gal. 3:15-16). Neither can any scripture be broken (John 10:35), nor would Yahweh change it, for Yahweh does not change (Mal. 3:6; Heb. 13:8).
Here’s the logic: since the eternal inheritance was promised in the Abrahamic Covenants of Promise and did not originate in the later Torah of Moses (Old Covenant), the inheritance found in the Torah of Moses must itself somehow be derived from the Abrahamic Covenants of Promise.
Transgressions Cause Torah of Moses
The next question naturally arises, “If the eternal inheritance was already promised in the Abrahamic Covenants of Promise, why bring about another covenant granting the same inheritance?”
Why then the Torah (of Moses)? It was προσετέθη (prosetethe; an augmentation) for the sake of transgressions, until should have come the σπέρμα (sperma; group of seed, the elect) to whom the promise has been made, having been ordained through angels in a mediator’s hand. But the mediator is not of one, but the deity is one. Is the Torah then against the promises of the deity? May it not be. For if a Torah was given which was able to quicken, indeed by a Torah would have been justification; but the Scriptures shut all things under sin, that the promise out of trust might be given to those that trust Yahushua the messiah.” (Galatians 3:19-22)
A προσετέθη (prosetethe) or augmentation does not add to a contract. It merely expands or restricts the requirements already allowed for by the original covenant or contract agreement. The Greek word that would actually be used to add to the contract allowing for contradictions to the original agreement would be ἐπιδιατάσσομαι (epidiatássomai) meaning “supplement” or “addition.”
For example, if a condition of the Abrahamic Covenants is that one must obey Yahweh, Yahweh can later augment that covenant by having his heirs build a Tabernacle and associate with that artifact a priesthood and certain religious services of cleanliness, as long as these works do not contradict the conditions of the original covenant.
On the other hand, if a condition of the covenant is that you shall not steal, Yahweh cannot later command that you should steal. Augmentations allow for the establishment of specified customs in dress, foods, and cleansing rites—all found as fleshly works of the Torah—which were meant to keep one ritualistically clean.
The expression “works of the Law” was used by the apostle Paul in the first century C.E. to define these augmentations (Rom. 3:20; Gal. 2:16, 3:2, 5, 10). They refer specifically to the purity laws found in the written Torah of Moses (Old Covenant). This detail is confirmed by the fact that this label was given to the contents of a Hebrew manuscript (MMT) written by a contemporary Jewish community located at Qumran.
Among the subjects listed under this heading were rulings concerning the cleansing of lepers, the barring of the blind and deaf from the Temple, the restriction of intermarriage with the Ammonites and Moabites, the prohibition of intermarriage between the priests and commoners, the prohibition against plowing with unlike animals, the use of hides and bones of unclean animals, as well as the rules for purification, offerings, sacrifices, and other such things.
Therefore, the Torah of Moses (Old Covenant) came about because the Israelites had transgressed the conditions of the Abrahamic Covenants of Promise, to which they were subject. The Torah of Moses, as a result, under a marriage agreement, augmented the requirements of the earlier Abrahamic Covenants of Promise (Torah of Trust).
What then were these augmentations and how are they different from the original conditions? And did these augmentations bring into existence things like the festival celebrations and sanctified days of Yahweh or merely dress them with customs?
To answer these questions we must examine more precisely what makes up the Torah of Moses (Old Covenant) and why it was considered the proper response to Israelite transgression.
It must be recognized that the Torah of Moses (Old Covenant) is a series of covenants. The Torah of Moses was much more than the agreement made at Mount Sinai. Rather, it became a series of handwritten augmentations created because the Israelites were unable to keep their covenant with Yahweh.
Also, these augmentations encompassed everything from building a Tabernacle and restricting the priesthood to the family of Levi to establishing further covenants, statutes, and laws, including regulations for cleanliness, food offerings, required sacrifices, and burnt offerings.
These augmentations developed as follows: To begin with, the Covenants of Promise given to Abraham by Yahweh was in the form of a verbal contract. Nothing was placed in writing. It was backed only by the word of Yahweh.
Centuries later, Yahweh reports that he revealed himself to the Israelites while they were in Egypt, requesting them not to defile themselves with the idols of Egypt, i.e., they should obey Yahweh and not commit idolatry (follow other eloahim). In turn, he would bring them into the Promised Land (Ezek. 20:5-7).
It is manifest that obedience to Yahweh included obeying his commandments, statutes, and laws which he had earlier included as conditions to the Covenants of Promise given to Abraham.
Israelites Rebel Against Yahweh
Contrary to the conditions of the Abrahamic Covenants of Promise, the Israelites rebelled by disobeying. Yet, Yahweh did not destroy them while they were in Egypt. He was unwilling to destroy them for the reason of his name’s sake, so that his name would not be profaned among the nations (Ezek. 20:8-9).
Put another way, he continued with them because his sacred name was attached to the Abrahamic Covenants of Promise, sworn to by an oath (Heb. 6:13-19). If he failed to accomplish these covenants of giving the Israelites the land as an inheritance then the other nations would speak ill of the worth of Yahweh’s word as sworn to Abraham (Ezek. 36:16-23; Deut. 9:25-29). Yahweh’s name (honor) was at stake!
Knowledge Prior to Torah of Moses
When Yahweh brought the Israelites out of Egypt and into the wilderness, he gave them knowledge of his statutes and judgments, “which if mankind does them he will live in them; and also my Sabbaths to be a sign between me and them, that they might know that I am Yahweh, who sets them apart (Ezek. 20:10-12).”
Further, the statement that the Israelites were given knowledge of Yahweh’s Sabbaths in the plural, demonstrates that the high Sabbaths as well as the weekly Sabbaths were meant.
Of interest for our discussion is the fact that, among these statutes, laws, and commandments known prior to the Israelites arriving at Mount Sinai, there were those dealing with the Sabbath day, the Festival of Unleavened Bread and Passover of which specific mention is made (Exod. 12:1-51, 13:4-10, 16:4, 22-30).
After the Israelites arrived at Mount Sinai, the marriage contract of the Old Covenant was made due to continued Israelite transgression.
Statutes and Judgments Attached in Writing
Also, two important things occurred.
• First, the Old Covenant was placed into writing, clearly spelling out what was required.
• Second, attached to the conditions of the Ten Commandments were the statutes augmented with the judgments (Exod. 20:1-24:8)—judgments being statutes that render criminal decisions if a required commandment or statute is broken.
Previously, only the requirements of the Abrahamic Covenants of Promise were expressed—for example, if one breaks the conditions of the Abrahamic Covenants, he does not receive the eternal inheritance; therefore without the eternal inheritance giving life, one is left with eternal death.
With the advent of the Old Covenant made at Mount Sinai, specific types of punishment for breaking these requirements were declared in written form.
Further Augmentions Allowed
The authority to continue with further augmentations to the Torah of Moses is also found among the Old Covenant statutes. The Torah of Moses commanded that the Israelites must “guard from the face” of the angel who carries the name of Yahweh (Exod. 23:20-21).
It commanded the Israelites to “listen to his voice; do not be rebellious against him, for he will not forgive your transgression, for my name is on him (Exod. 23:21).”
Of course, being careful does not mean that one is to listen to the voice of the angel Yahweh if he adds to the conditions of the instructions outside of what was allowed for in the original Abrahamic Covenants of Promise. Such supplements, as we have already proven, are forbidden (Gal. 3:15).
Works of “The Law”
Yet, if the Israelites transgressed the conditions of the Abrahamic Covenants of Promise, the angel Yahweh was allowed to augment the marriage covenant of the Torah of Moses. These augmentations were subjoined as part of the Torah of Moses or Old Covenant, and are in part known as the “works of the Torah (Law).”
For instance, the original statutes found in the Torah of Moses commanded that the Israelites were to keep the Festival of Tabernacles (Exod. 23:16). The “works of the Torah” later augmented this statute with the custom that the Israelites should also sleep in tabernacles (tents, booths) during the Festival of Tabernacles (Lev. 23:39-43).
After the incident of the Israelites building the golden calf—thereby committing idolatry and breaking their marriage agreement of the Old Covenant with Yahweh—the angel Yahweh kept augmenting the conditions of the covenant with commandments, statutes, and laws specifying in greater detail what was required.
From this process, the “works of the Torah” (e.g., sacrifices, cleansing rites, washings, etc.) also came into existence. For example, after the sin of the golden calf, Yahweh made another covenant with the Israelites (Exod. 34:1-28), and then later added the Levitical regulations.
The key point is that the majority of these statutes and laws forming the “works of the Torah” had no severe adverse penalty. To demonstrate, if unclean meat was eaten, the most that would happen is that the guilty person would be declared unclean and unable to attend sacred ceremonies, enter the tabernacle, or remain in the Israelite camp until they became legally clean again.
Breaking one of the commandments, statutes, or laws that were also attached to the Abrahamic Covenants of Promise, on the other hand, met with serious consequences which could include death.
Israelites Continue to Rebel
Nevertheless, the Israelites continued to rebel, once more breaking the statutes and laws and profaning the Sabbaths (Ezek. 20:13). Indeed, Yahweh counted “ten” rebellions from the time he began to bring them out of Egypt until they arrived for the first time at Qadesh Barnea, including their rebellion at Mount Sinai (Num. 14:19-25).
For his name’s sake, Yahweh did not destroy Israel, but neither did he bring that generation (those who had left Egypt at the age of 20 years and upward) into the Promised Land (Num. 14:20-24; Deut. 1:34-40, 2:13-17).
After the death of almost all of that generation who had left Egypt, Yahweh told the children of the next generation to walk in his statutes and judgments and keep his Sabbaths (Ezek. 20:14-24). Once more they rebelled, this time in the incident at Shittim with Baal-peor (Num. 25:1-26:1).
As a result, at the end of a 40-year sojourn in the wilderness, Yahweh “gave them statutes not good and judgments by which they could not live (Ezek. 20:25),” i.e., he made the Deuteronomic Covenant, an augmentation of the Torah of Moses (Old Covenant) which is recorded in the book of Deuteronomy.
The Deuteronomic Covenant put in place curses that would come upon the Israelites if they once more failed to listen to the voice of Yahweh and observe his commanded statutes and judgments (Deut. 11:26-32, 27:1-29:1)—the ultimate curse being death (Deut. 30:19).
When Moses died, such augmentations ceased to be enacted. The books of Moses were in turn followed by the books of the prophets (from Joshua to Malachi), providing the official history of Israel and prophecies of what will be.
The Old Testament, as a result, is often referred to as “the Torah and the Prophets.”
Because Israel continued to sin, Yahu Yahweh (Yahushua the messiah) did not enter into his great Sabbath rest in Zion, leaving that entry for a future time (Heb. 3:7-11; Deut. 12:9-11; Pss. 95:9-11, 132:13-14).
This concludes the first part of our investigation.
Just proceed on to Part 2 whenever you’re ready!
Who was that masked man anyway?